Religion shapes the lives of a significant proportion of young people — their values, their practices, their sense of community, and their understanding of the world. Yet youth work in much of Europe treats religion as a topic to be carefully avoided: too sensitive, too divisive, too likely to create conflict. This avoidance is understandable. It is also a failure of the field.
The avoidance is partly historical. European youth work developed largely in secular political traditions — socialist, liberal, social democratic — that positioned religion as a private matter, separate from the civic education and social development purposes of youth work. Many youth workers were trained to steer clear of religious topics in group settings.
It is also partly pragmatic. Religion can create conflict in mixed groups. Facilitators who lack knowledge or confidence in this area prefer to avoid it. And organisational cultures often reinforce avoidance by treating any incident involving religion as a crisis to be managed rather than a learning opportunity.
For young people who experience faith as central to their identity — and research suggests this includes a significant minority of young people in Europe, particularly among communities of migrant heritage — avoidance sends a clear message: this important part of who you are is not welcome here. This undermines inclusion claims and damages trust.
You cannot claim to practice intercultural dialogue if you systematically exclude the dimension of experience that is most central to many of the young people you work with. Religious identity is cultural identity. The two are not separable.
Engaging religious diversity in youth work does not mean running interfaith dialogue workshops or requiring everyone to discuss their beliefs. It means creating an environment where religious identity can be present without being either performed or suppressed.
In the Turkish-German context that is central to YouthTICK's work, religion adds a specific dimension to intercultural dialogue. German-Turkish young people often navigate the intersection of Muslim identity, secular European norms, and Turkish cultural heritage in ways that are highly individual and frequently misunderstood by both the majority German and Turkish societies. Youth exchanges that create space for this complexity — without flattening it into stereotypes from either direction — offer something genuinely valuable.